The Greeks believed that to be an orator, an individual had to be morally good. As much as I would like to agree with the Greeks, unfortunately I disagree with such belief. One might not be entirely dishonest in his or her moral principles, and still be considered an orator. A great example would be one of the former presidents of Brazil, Fernando Collor de Melo. Although he impressed many people with his eloquent speeches over the course of his presidential campaign, it turned out that he was extremely dishonest with his country upon being elected.
Melo was so dishonest that his impeachment was inevitable in 1992. Regardless his dishonest character, nobody can say Melo is not an orator. He was able to manipulate the elements “goodness”, “truth”, and public communication to achieve his goal to become the president of Brazil. And due to some people’s ‘short memory’, Melo was elected as Senator in 2006. All he did to return to the political arena was to manipulate goodness, truth and public communication.
In the end, THE best orators – those I truly admire and I use as my mirrors are the ones who indeed employ goodness and truth in their public communication.
Ibirapuera
W16 - Discussion Question # 3
15 years ago

